structurE of The Australian
Electricity Industry
Updated August 2006
The restructuring of the Australian electricity industry has now been proceeding for 16 years since the industry itself set up a reform working group during 1990. This reform process has been the most profound and major restructuring in the 100 year life of the Australian electricity industry.
The restructuring consists of:
• introduction of competition;
• unbundling of ESI functions;
• reorganisation of the electricity market;
• separation of network charges;
• privatisation of electricity businesses in some States;
• formalisation of ESI regulation.
Introduction of Competition
A major objective of ESI restructuring in
Unbundling of ESI Functions
Until the mid-1990s, in some Australian states (eg
A major objective of electricity industry restructuring in
• several competing generation businesses have been established in each State;
• a single monopoly transmission business has been established in each State;
• geographical monopoly franchises for distribution have been retained in States that already had them and have been created in the other States. In some States, the number of existing franchises, and therefore of distribution businesses, has been reduced;
• a two tier system has been established for electricity retailing in each State:
▪ ‘first tier’ retailers are attached to a distribution business with a monopoly geographical franchise in that State. First tier retailers can sell electricity to customers throughout the State, whether or not the customers are located within the accompanying distribution franchise. The retail business is “ring fenced” from the distribution business (ie established as a separate accounting entity within one holding company);
▪ ‘second tier’ retailers are stand-alone businesses not attached to a distribution business in the relevant State. Second tier retailers can also sell electricity to customers throughout the State. A second tier retailer in one State may be a first tier retailer in another State.
reorganisation of the electricity market
The reorganisation of the electricity market is the third major change in the structure of the Australian electricity industry. Currently, the reorganised electricity market is in three parts: wholesale, ancillary services and retail.
Wholesale Electricity Market
The major Australian wholesale electricity market, the National Electricity
Market (NEM), comprises the sale of bulk electricity by generators to
electricity retailers and large end‑use customers in southern and eastern
The NEM operates in the States of New South Wales,
The NEM operates on the world’s longest
interconnected power system – from Port Douglas in
The NEM commenced on
The market operator for the NEM is the National Electricity Market Management Company (NEMMCO). The owners of the company are the five States and the Territory within which the NEM operates. NEMMCO was established in 1996 to fulfil the roles of both market operator of the NEM and operator of the power system that underpins NEM operations. NEMMCO is responsible for generator dispatch, reliability management and financial settlements in the NEM.
In addition to physical spot trading through the NEM, there is a separate over-the-counter short term forward trading market for electricity. In this market, purchasers lock in energy prices through financial hedging contracts (“contracts for differences”). Under a standard bilateral hedging contract, the purchaser (typically an electricity retailer) agrees to purchase a specified physical quantity of energy from the spot market at a set price (the “strike price”). If the actual price paid in the spot market by the purchaser is higher than the strike price, the counterparty to the contract (typically an electricity generator or a financial institution) pays the purchaser the difference in cost. Conversely, if the price paid is lower than the strike price, the purchaser pays the counterparty the difference.
Hedging contracts are financial instruments and can be traded in a market similar to other financial markets. There are numerous variations on the standard hedging contact available in the market, often containing complicated financial arrangements. The purpose of hedging contracts is to manage the price risks involved in purchasing electricity from the wholesale spot market. Prices in the spot market are highly volatile and the spot price can spike to several hundred times the average price for short periods.
Ancillary Services Markets
The National Electricity Market also includes a range of different markets for ancillary services, managed by NEMMCO, including:
• eight distinct markets for Frequency Control Ancillary Services in which providers make offers of services to manage frequency within specifications up to a 5-minute horizon; and
• long term contracts for Network Control Ancillary Services and System Restart Ancillary Services negotiated between NEMMCO (on behalf of the market) and the market participant providing the service.
Retail Electricity Market
The retail electricity market comprises sales of electricity by retailers to end‑use customers. Within the area covered by the NEM, the retail market is partly competitive and partly operates on a franchise basis.
In the competitive retail market, electricity retailers compete to supply the vast majority of large customers who choose not to purchase directly from the wholesale market and smaller customers who opt out of purchasing electricity from their first tier retailer. Such customers are termed ‘contestable’.
In most jurisdictions in which the NEM operates (eg
In
Under this structure for the retail electricity market, retailers actually shield retail customers from the price volatility in the NEM wholesale spot market. In effect, retailers provide price risk insurance for retail customers, with the retail price paid by the customer including an insurance premium component.
Currently, there is a move to abolish retail price controls for all customers in all jurisdictions in which the NEM operates. This is likely to be introduced progressively over the next few years as competition in the retail electricity markets in each jurisdiction becomes more effective.
Separation of network charges
Originally,
network charges, covering the cost of transporting electricity from the
generator to the point of end-use, were bundled together with energy charges in
calculating the electricity price to be charged to the end use customer.
Following the establishment of the NEM, both generators
and end-use customers are required to pay separate network charges. In the wholesale market, market participants
who purchase electricity directly from the spot market are responsible for also
paying connection charges and ‘use of system’ charges directly to
their local transmission and distribution network owners. In the retail market, network charges
incurred by end-use customers are paid for them by their electricity retailer
who packages these network charges together with the energy charge. In some electricity bills the network charges
are separately identified but many bills continue to show one price to the end‑use
customer.
Privatisation of Electricity Businesses
For the 50 years prior to the mid-1990s, the majority of
electricity businesses in
Commencing in the
mid-1990s, some State governments (eg
More recently,
there has been wave of selling of electricity businesses by the original
private sector owners to new private sector purchasers. These new purchasers often own more than one
electricity business. The end result has
been some rebundling of the ownership of the previously unbundled ESI
functions, eg a single owner may own both an electricity generator and a retail
business, though these must be operated as separate businesses.
Formalisation
of Regulation
Prior to the mid-1990s, regulation of the Australian
electricity industry was carried out on an informal basis because most of the
businesses were government-owned and were operated as a public service rather
than as profit-making commercial ventures.
For example, increases in electricity prices were often agreed in
informal meetings between the senior management of the electricity businesses
and the relevant government Minister.
Once competition was introduced into the electricity
industry, and particularly as some electricity businesses became privately
owned, a more formal system of regulation was required. Consequently, State and territory governments
established new agencies to regulate the electricity industry (plus often other
industries as well). By mid-2004, this
jurisdictional-based regulation resulted in the Australian electricity industry
being regulated by 13 separate agencies.
Commencing in 2005, this situation was rationalised with regulation of
the industry being progressively transferred to national regulatory agencies.
Currently, regulation of the electricity industry in
• the Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC); and
• the Australian Energy Regulator (AER).
The Australian Energy
Market Commission (AEMC)
has responsibility for rule-making and market development in relation to the
NEM. The AEMC reports directly to the Ministerial Council on Energy (MCE). The MCE includes Commonwealth, State and
Territory energy ministers, in addition to ministers from
The AEMC is responsible for:
• administration and publication of the National Electricity Rules;
• the Rule making process under the National Electricity Law;
• making determinations on proposed Rules;
• undertaking reviews on its own initiative or as directed by the MCE; and
• providing policy advice to the MCE in relation to the National Electricity Market.
The Australian Energy
Regulator (AER) performs economic regulation of the wholesale electricity
market and electricity transmission networks in the NEM, and enforcement of the
National Electricity Law and National Electricity Rules. These functions will expand over time as electricity
distribution and retail functions are scheduled to transfer to the AER by the
end of 2006.
Under the National
Electricity Law and National
Electricity Rules, the AER’s key responsibilities, as at mid-2006,
include:
• regulating the revenues of transmission network service providers by establishing revenue caps;
• monitoring the wholesale electricity market;
• monitoring compliance with the National Electricity Law, National Electricity Rules and National Electricity Regulations;
• investigating breaches or possible breaches of provisions of the National Electricity Law, Rules and Regulations;
• instituting and conducting enforcement proceedings against relevant market participants;
• establishing service standards for electricity transmission network service providers;
• establishing ring-fencing guidelines for business operations with respect to regulated transmission services; and
• exempting network service providers from registration.
As at mid-2006, State and territory regulators continue
to be
responsible for regulation of electricity distribution and retail functions
within the jurisdictions in which the NEM operates. This includes the responsibility for
regulating retail prices and distribution network use of system charges. At present, the individual regulators adopt
somewhat different regulatory approaches within their jurisdictions. Subject to agreement by the individual
jurisdictions, the responsibility for regulating electricity distribution and
retail functions is scheduled to be transferred to the AER by the end of 2006
and it is likely that a single national approach to regulation will then be
adopted.
Structure
of the Australian Electricity Industry
A multi-national
research project carried out by the International Energy Agency’s Demand-Side Management Programme developed
four generic models for the structure of electricity industries.
The four models are:
Model 1 - Vertically integrated
monopoly
Model 2 - Unbundled monopoly
Model 3 - Unbundled, limited
competition
Model 4 - Unbundled, full
competition
Descriptions and diagrams of these models are available here.
In the case of the Australian electricity industry, the original structure before the mid-1990s
was similar to Model 1. Following the
restructuring in mid-1990s, the industry structure is similar to Model 4 in
States where all customers are potentially contestable (eg
Reform
of the Australian electricity industry
Role of DSM and Energy Efficiency